All Comments

SubjectCommenterDate Postedsort icon
Tremont West is surelyjerleen104/11/2010 - 00:34
block clubs are owned by the residentsdwebb04/10/2010 - 22:51
I'll love to knock on some doors here for youNorm Roulet04/10/2010 - 22:08
FBI probedwebb04/10/2010 - 21:13
Carol A. Johnson,jerleen104/10/2010 - 20:44
Well, I have questioned thatjerleen104/10/2010 - 20:40
thank youtremontsoul04/10/2010 - 20:40
Block Club meetings usuallyjerleen104/10/2010 - 20:36
what are thetremontsoul04/10/2010 - 20:35
contact information for BZAdwebb04/10/2010 - 20:34
Thomas and Bart Leneghan, owners, Tremont Development Groupdwebb04/10/2010 - 20:28
can the block communitiestremontsoul04/10/2010 - 20:26
also on the BZA agendadwebb04/10/2010 - 20:25
loss of your timebj04/10/2010 - 20:18
to whom or where do i needtremontsoul04/10/2010 - 20:13
He has always been known asjerleen104/10/2010 - 20:02
Paul Jones was/is thetremontsoul04/10/2010 - 19:59
thank you and I do agreetremontsoul04/10/2010 - 19:38
The appeal is only for thejerleen104/10/2010 - 19:34
We are glad that you found realneolmiller04/10/2010 - 19:26
These heroic people of TremontNorm Roulet04/10/2010 - 19:23
That is why you must write ajerleen104/10/2010 - 19:20
thank you for your feedback,tremontsoul04/10/2010 - 19:18
Who is Paul Jones?dwebb04/10/2010 - 19:13
are they also or onlytremontsoul04/10/2010 - 19:06
yes we were notified only 1tremontsoul04/10/2010 - 19:04
the truck's, equipment, andtremontsoul04/10/2010 - 19:01
isn't that using federaltremontsoul04/10/2010 - 18:56
it is basically a variancetremontsoul04/10/2010 - 18:54
Living under Oligarchylmcshane04/10/2010 - 18:50
I wouldn't agree to anythingjerleen104/10/2010 - 18:13
Not worth the paper it'sjerleen104/10/2010 - 18:10
I understand.  I havejerleen104/10/2010 - 18:07
 It was turned in to BOZAjerleen104/10/2010 - 18:05
I don't see anyone beingjerleen104/10/2010 - 17:54
we had proposed a wonderfultremontsoul04/10/2010 - 17:52
No, they are not leasingjerleen104/10/2010 - 17:52
maybe go back to the courtdwebb04/10/2010 - 17:49
yes they are actually wetremontsoul04/10/2010 - 17:41
wasn't the one patio to be atremontsoul04/10/2010 - 17:38
I definetly know how involved you arelmiller04/10/2010 - 17:32
 lmiller04/10/2010 - 17:31
so they are already illegaldwebb04/10/2010 - 17:29
DO NOT OWNjerleen104/10/2010 - 17:26
are they rentingdwebb04/10/2010 - 17:20
emphasis on, " they do not own"lmiller04/10/2010 - 17:16
thank you i read the articletremontsoul04/10/2010 - 17:14
notice of appeal variancestremontsoul04/10/2010 - 17:12
good neighbor policydwebb04/10/2010 - 17:11
looks to be vacant landdwebb04/10/2010 - 17:10
« first‹ previous…224225226227228229230231232…next ›last »