telecommunications harassement - ohio first court of appeals case- click the attachment to view

Submitted by Quest-News-Serv... on Fri, 03/19/2010 - 17:03.
 telecommunications harassement - ohio first court of appeals case- click the attachment to  view
 
 
 
 
ANTI-SPECIESISM:
SPECIESISM:
1. A PREJUDICE OF ATTITUDE OF BIAS TOWARD THE INTERESTS OF MEMEBERS OF ONE'S OWN SPECIES
AND AGAINIST THOSE OF MEMBERS OF OTHER SPECIES.
2. A WORD USED TO DESCRIBE THE WIDESPREAD DISCRIMINATION THAT IS PRACTICED
BY HOMO SAPIENS AGANIST THE OTHER SPECIES.
SAVE OTHER-OUR SPECIES
SOS-FRE
FROM RESEARCH EXPERIMENT
QUEST, MINISTRIES, GUY TEMPELTON BLACK, PASTOR, and YOGI YOGA BEAR, SERVICE K-9 (guy's partner)
753 BRAYTON AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44113-4604 USA, V:216.861.7368, F:216.861.7368
UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES VETERAN (VOLUNTEER) PEACE, ANTI-WAR, DEFENSIVE
faith based non-profit corporation no. 389646, 501(c)(3), SINCE 1965,
questministry [at] att [dot] net
ADVOCATING FOR A NATIONAL WAR DOGS MEMORIAL http://www.nationalwardogsmonument.org
DONATE TO QUEST
 
"When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers, and for a time they seem invincible, but in the end, they always fall — think of it, always." - Mahatma Gandhi

 

http://www.disclosureproject.com  TRUTH  -  EXTRA-TERRESTRIAL

AttachmentSize
TELLICUMUNICATION_HARRESSMENT.pdf135.72 KB
( categories: )

Telecommunications Harassment - should Alien2 be prosecuted?

Submitted by Norm Roulet on Fri, 03/19/2010 - 17:18.

                            Telecommunications Harassment
                  The state prosecuted Ellison under R.C. 2917.21(B), which provides that
“[n]o person shall make or cause to be made a telecommunication, or permit a
telecommunication to be made from a telecommunications device under the person’s
control, with purpose to abuse, threaten, or harass another person.” The state proceeded
in this case under a theory that Ellison had posted a “rumor” on the Internet to harass
Gerhard.
 

We need to look at whether there are people who use this telecommunications device to harass realNEO members, as that would seem to fit Telecommunications Harassment.

For example, right now, is Alien2 here to harass Guy or anyone on realNEO?

Is that a violation of the telcommunications harassment act and should Alien2 be prosecuted?

Disrupt IT

harrassment

Submitted by westward on Fri, 03/19/2010 - 18:21.

 {¶15} Importantly, the statute creates a specific-intent crime:  the state must 

prove the defendant’s specific purpose to harass.  The burden is not met by establishing 
only that the defendant knew or should have known that her conduct would probably 
cause harassment.  The legislature has created this substantial burden to limit the statute’s 
scope to criminal conduct, not the expression of offensive speech.  Whether Ellison was 
liable for defamation was not established in the proceedings below and can be addressed 
in civil proceedings.  
 

norm please return my calls or email me

Submitted by Quest-News-Serv... on Fri, 03/19/2010 - 23:07.

norm please return my calls or email me

yogi and guy http://www.nationalwardogsmonument.org/

At least you know how to reach me...

Submitted by Norm Roulet on Fri, 03/19/2010 - 23:52.

Nice talking - let's get some papers filed.

Disrupt IT