SearchUser loginOffice of CitizenRest in Peace,
Who's new
|
What is your opinion about being under public and private video surveillance without your knowledge or right to accessSubmitted by Norm Roulet on Sun, 08/16/2009 - 11:04.
|
Recent commentsPopular contentToday's:All time:Last viewed:
|
Norm, 1984
True that
Norm--Jeff,
Nice observations. Too, for those who don't have a library card, perhaps having limited literacy skills, there's a wonderful film that was made some years back, which was based on the book 1984. You can watch the entire film for free at this link.
wifi HEAD CAMS in Tremont - excellent idea!
Hey, you might want to hook
Hey, you might want to hook up Dan Lutz too. He bobbs around from block club to block club - writing grants for the camera project (with the assistance of Sammy the buffer) in areas he doesn't even live in. He was the one who wrote up the grant for Central tremont Block Club wherein they quoted the all-time high price of $24,000+ to purchase and install three (3) cameras in our area.
Back to the missing signs - there were posted right next to the Tree House on Professor - and if TWDC, who I believe stationed one of those cameras on St. John Cantius Church according to Sammy Catania, is in control of the viewing they should be able to see clearly who took the signs - but since nobody has any access except TWDC, I'm sure the footage can be doctored.
why
would they incriminate themselves???
TAke the video 5th - Watch your HEAD
Actually, there is one other housekeeping item that needs to be done before we send Sammy and Chris off with their head cams...
I have contacted Mr. Kucinich and Sen. Voinovich (retired) to have this passed next week. Or are they still on va-ca?
sorry-
- i was being sarcastic.
but i dO think the Sammy & Chris headcams are a marvelous idea!
I can just see it now.
I can just see it now. Bemus and Buthead with head cams on.
beemus and butthead
It is good to blow off some steam, isn't it?
self head cam incrimination
We will keep a close eye on this legislation.
i think you have all been drinking....
you so funny!
here's a cheaper alternative - they have these little wallet sized video cams that operate on 2 AA batteries and shoot an hour of digital video. I keep one in my bag.
but the head cam idea dOEs sound tempting - I was so excited when I learned about the Minox camera, had one to use for a couple of weeks when I was in my 20s. Always wanted something that could record things exactly as i saw them... saves a lot of explaining.....
Participatory Panopticon
I prefer an infinite number of little brothers. You can see me, and I can see you too.
Other people can watch me, remember what they saw, and analyze in real-time or post-facto without my knowledge or right to access. This is inherent to almost all humans' eye and brain technology. We have designed our world around it.
The technology to see from other points-of-view and with higher fidelity, (both, in fact, approaching infinity,) is a technology that gets cheaper, easier, and more accessible as time passes.
This will inevitably cause a major shift in societal organization, (all-seeing, all-hearing, and the obselesence of the concept of privacy.) However, we'll delay and resist that shift as long as possible, as we still value privacy.
We're better served by ensuring that this the rights and ability to use this technology be maintained by the greatest number, (as opposed to a select few,) rather than by arresting the development or ubiquity of the tech.
Read more about the Participatory Panopticon, and check out a great talk on same by Jamais Cascio.